data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34555/34555f2ac5a24ff61a0469ad22f868cdb319ecc5" alt=""
2014 in L'Alpe di Siusi, fresh from the US and Australia.
This site will be undergoing upgrades for the next months (from Sep 2021). Check back in from time to time!
If you would like a consultation, go to the 'Enquiries' button at right and fill out the form
To subscribe to the monthly newsletter, go to the 'Subscribe' button at right
I can be reached and read at the social media icons, top right
Comments to newsletters are temporarily closed. If you want to comment, contact me at admin@malvinartley.com or use the 'Enquiries' button, at right
The full moon
Current events
The spectacle
The other spectacle
Palestine update
Coordinated response
Within the next days
A moderating force
War with Iran?
The waiting game
Israel divided
The UK riots
Ukraine update
US politics as spectacle
In conclusion
Greetings Everyone!
Greetings from Rome, actually. I am finishing this letter here, which I should have sent out a few weeks ago – the Cancer Blue Moon letter. So, here it is. Why, you may ask, is it so late? In a word, or acronym – COVID – which has moved through our household for the past few weeks in various stages. I don’t really care if people say it is just a bad flu or whatever. We got tested for it because Von der Leyen is threatening another bout of ‘boosters’ (for what, we may ask) this fall. With a positive result we just side-stepped it. But this is all old news. This bout of it affected me with pronounced fatigue and an inability to focus for a couple of weeks, except for brief intervals. Then, my wife got it. We have been a little bit out of sorts at the house, needless to say. And in the midst of all that, the world kept turning, events kept happening. And then the assassination attempt happened…and then Biden was resigned in a palace coup. I did a report on the Trump affair, linked later on in this letter, in the midst of recovering from COVID. I am not complaining, just filling you in on news from home. But on to more interesting matters, why have I come to Rome? The reasons are several.
The wait staff in this Jewish kosher-style restaurant was all Indian, and seemed quite out of place in such a setting. The food was not bad, but on the menu you notice a lot of dishes made with parts of animals most Americans would never eat. I won’t mention them. But it is reflective of the fact the Jews were separated out from the main community and were probably poor. The ghetto is next to the ancient Roman sites. The buildings and architecture reflect it. The reason to bring up this particular place is the Jewish connection and what will be discussed later here, which is quite important going into the next full moon – the coming attacks on Israel. Israel-Palestine has been on everyone’s mind since October especially. The problem there is not Judaism, per se, but Zionism instead, which we have covered more extensively in recent letters. But sitting in this Jewish restaurant in the quartiere ebreico (Jewish ghetto), surrounded by ancient Roman ruins, a community that has co-existed more or less peacefully with the Romans and Italians for many centuries, one has to wonder how we came to our present situation in West Asia. Judaism itself coexists peacefully alongside numerous nations and cultures and has done so for millennia. And the restaurants there along ‘restaurant row’ in the ghetto were full of tourists from all over the world. Not seen at all in the quarter were Israeli flags, also of interest. That brings us to another point, which merges into our present theme for this letter (Cancer).
Cancer: It seems to be such a trite and glib statement these days to say ‘we are all one humanity’. In fact there is only a tiny bit of DNA that makes for the various races, yet the blood which courses through our veins is universal, usable across races if need be, and made of the same ‘stuff’. It would be accurate to say we are all of the same blood, as a general statement. The various blood types are the same across cultures. What makes us different is simply our perception and attachments to our ideas and cultures. And cultures are the primary determinants for our ideological orientations, contributing strongly to public opinion. These thoughts are encapsulated in the following statement:
“The world is one world and its sufferings are one; humanity is in truth a unity, but many are still unaware of this and the whole trend of the present teaching is directed to the awakening of humanity to this while there is yet time to avert still more serious conditions. The sins of humanity are also one. Its goal is one and it is as one great human family that we must emerge into the future. I would emphasize this thought: it is as one humanity, chastened, disciplined but illumined and fused, that we must emerge into the future. Those who do not grasp this important fact, whether they are what is called belligerents or neutrals, will suffer deeply as a result of their non-participation in the fate of the whole.”[3]
Cancer is the door into incarnation,[4] family life and blood ties are implicit in that statement. Also implicit in that statement is the factor of karma and soul groups (destinies), which brings us all together, hopefully in service. Cancer is also the door into incarnation after the karmic necessity for incarnation is removed (once we free ourselves from the cycle of rebirth, life and death). But of greater interest here is what happens as we cycle through our incarnations: We come to the increasing realization over lifetimes that, “It is in order eventually to negate the space-time concept and to prove it an illusion that the door in Cancer opens to the sacrificing, serving soul.” Seen from the angle of the soul, time is not linear. In fact, time as we know it does not exist to our soul:
“Seen from the inner side where time is not [from the higher Self/Soul/Triad], the human creature demonstrates as an amazing kaleidoscopic mutable phenomenon. Bodies, so called, or rather aggregates of atomic units, fade out and disappear, or flash again into manifestation. Streams of colours pass and repass; they twine or intertwine. Certain areas will then suddenly intensify their brightness and blaze forth with brilliance; or again they can be seen dying out and the phenomenon in certain areas will be colourless and apparently non-existent. But always there is a persistent over-shadowing light, from which a stream of lights pours down into the phenomenal man;..”
We have examined before in these letters the idea that we do not come into this life alone or as a separate being. We all have shared destiny. Destiny is of the soul, whereas karma is more about the personality, though souls do have their karma as well. We come into life because of a sense of purpose, a purpose only known through contact with our own souls. There is indeed a soul path for each of us, however dimly or clearly sensed. We are here for experience, yes, but we are more so here for a purpose. And we share our lives with people who are either on the same path or paths complementary to our own.
“The whole emphasis of the entire evolutionary process is, in the last analysis, placed upon the development of conscious, intelligent awareness in the life animating the various forms. The exact state of awareness is contingent upon the age of the soul. Yet the soul has no age from the standpoint of time, as humanity understand it. It is timeless and eternal. Before the soul there passes the kaleidoscope of the senses, and the recurring [Page 24] drama of outer phenomenal existence; but throughout all these occurrences in time and space, the soul ever preserves the attitude of the Onlooker and of the perceiving Observer. It beholds and interprets.”[5]
The full moon took place on 21 July 2024 at 10:17 UTC (20:17 AEST). Before the assassination attempt on Trump I had been looking at the chart of the full moon as to what might transpire. If there was one word to describe the effect of this full moon it would be ‘breakpoint’. For the US in particular, given recent events there, there was indeed a breakpoint, with the recusal of Joe Biden from the race for the White House. The Sabian symbols for the full moon are quite apt for what took place, too:
The solar degree implies the glorification of the past. There actually is an organization called Daughters of the American Revolution. They say they are non-political and there are over a million members. It is a volunteer organization and they describe themselves as, “…a non-profit, non-political volunteer women’s service organization.” Their fundamentals are largely traditional conservative, though – family, education and patriotism:
“Daughters are vibrant, active women who are passionate about community service, preserving history, educating children, as well as honoring and supporting those who serve our nation.”
In that sense, ‘serving the nation’ means military service members. It all sounds quite Cancerian, yes, even though the founding date is Libran: Oct 11th, 1890 in Washington, DC. But those are sound values – service, supporting people who do serve the nation (and the ways of service are myriad), preserving a true history (which we have lost, really), with the last point being supremely important and the greatest service to community and nation – the care, nurturing and education of children along right and loving lines.
Current events: The following major events took place worldwide since the last full moon:
Then, there are the items that happened outside of the West or that went unreported that actually will have more bearing on our lives into the future, directly and indirectly:
“The dividing line of politics today is no longer between conservatives and liberals or between right and left, but between centrists who proclaim a new Europe and patriots and sovereignists who fight to preserve and strengthen the Europe of the people we value. Only through the victory and cooperation of patriotic and sovereignist parties across the continent can we secure a legacy for our children.”
The spectacle: From here we start our expansion on the points above. From one of the bullet points, above, the opening ceremony of the 2024 Olympics in Paris took place. Prior to that there was a coordinated sabotage of the high speed trains across France. The attacks paralyzed travel to the Olympics for over an hour. The culprits are yet to be found. The Israelis said the attacks were “…influenced by “Iran’s axis of evil and radical Islam.” No one believed it, especially due to a video that had been posted earlier of a supposed jihadist warning of a terrorist attack in Paris during the Olympics. It was the strangest thing: The ‘Hamas jihadist’ in the video had an Israeli accent. It was an obvious propaganda video. Then, later, the spectacle started. Why it was called a spectacle is probably already clear to people who watched it.
What we saw in the opening ceremony was Macron’s Parisian, metropolitan France. It was not the France of Le Pen or Melanchon, who represent the majority of French voters. There were videos of the reaction of average citizens of France to the ceremony, and they reacted in disgust. To the artistic set it was a celebration of French DEI (diversity, equality, inclusiveness) and naughtiness – a dig at more staid, conservative values. Opinions varied across international and independent media, with some praising the event while others condemned it. And in some countries certain scenes from the event were blacked out, like the depiction of the naked Dionysus and the ‘Last Supper’ scene.
What are we really seeing in the event and the reactions to it? And how does that play politically and culturally? Well, as many comments rightly pointed out, the Paris opening ceremony was a celebration of ‘woke culture’ – DEI – and in the rush to be ‘inclusive’ the larger part of France and its ancient culture was left out. And people felt excluded – the people (the majority) who hold traditional views of French and Western life and culture. They dislike having woke culture shoved upon them. And this brings us to the wider point regarding this topic: The mass of people, represented by Cancer, tend toward traditional values, family values. When they see this sort of thing (opening ceremony) they feel disenfranchised and ignored by the elites, the latter who largely congregate in the major cities of any nation. This is a divide we see very clearly in the United States, where the Democrats’ power base is in the major coastal cities of the US, whereas the Republican base tends to be more rural and traditionally conservative. There were other spectacles as well.
The other spectacle: On the 24th of July another glaring revelation of truth about Washington was staged in a joint session of Congress. Netanyahu addressed Congress in what can only be called a spectacle, exposing the utter hypocrisy of American leadership and the values they profess to hold – freedom, democracy, and so on. The address was not about Netanyahu. It was a statement about the US. The spectacle started with a standing ovation of a full three minutes. During the address to Congress Netanyahu stood there bald-faced and told Congress, the American people and the world lie after lie in his effort for securing an unending supply of arms for continuing the genocide and ultimately to corral Congress into going to war first with Hezbollah and ultimately with Iran, in what would be a last-ditched effort to save the Zionist project that is Israel and his own bacon. Apparently the US has greenlit Israel to expand the war in a major operation against Hezbollah. It would be a major strategic error on the part of the IOF, discussed below. And in the face of all that, he received 58 – fifty-eight – standing ovations. It was one of the most shameful nights of American politics in recent memory. It removed once and for all any shred of credibility Washington has when it comes to human rights. And it showed beyond doubt toward whose fealty those members of Congress in attendance displayed – except for one. The address and visit also may have sealed Israel’s fate, also to be discussed below.
Palestine update: On July 30 the Israelis struck a building in southern Beirut, aiming to assassinate the senior military commander of Hezbollah. They succeeded. They said it was in response for the missile that fell on the youth playing soccer in the Golan, an act the Israelis themselves committed. But in making the attempt in Beirut the IOF killed five other people, including a woman and two children, and wounded over 80 others. Hezbollah is weighing its response, which will be harsh, and which will target sites deep within Israel, and very likely Tel Aviv. Nasrallah just gave a speech on the matter, stating the response by Hezbollah will not be symbolic, but will rather be an open battle on all fronts. He further stated, “…there will be no solution [to the coming battle] except to stop the aggression on Gaza.” The assassination will have no effect on the command of Hezbollah, as they have a large pool of trained commanders.
Then, the next day, after the assassination of the Hezbollah commander, the Israelis or a proxy assassinated the political chief of Hamas, Haniyeh – in Tehran. The Iranians claim it was done via a missile fired from outside Iran (since verified), likely carried on an Israeli F35 stealth fighter. The Iranians, too, have vowed a harsh response, and have been given the UN’s blessing under Art. 51 – the right to self-defense. The assassination of Haniyeh was the gravest on the part of the Israelis, who do not seem to learn. Israel has a history of killing Hamas leaders who are trying to secure ceasefires. The two assassinations were for domestic consumption, to show the Israeli populace Israel is strong enough to do such things and not suffer any consequences. The act has only confirmed that Israel has no interest in securing a ceasefire. Apparently there will be no ceasefire, only an end to the war. As Nasrallah said in his speech, the Israelis may laugh a little now, but they will cry a lot later. In fact, in an urgent letter to the UNSC, Iran may have announced they will conduct their own SMO, against Israel. Only the Russians and the Chinese honored the letter and condemned the Israeli action. What the Iranian response means remains to be seen, but a former Lebanese lawmaker said,
“The response…was to feature retaliatory missile strikes by the Islamic Republic and regional resistance movements that would target the occupied Palestinian territories “from every direction.”
Coordinated response: And no doubt, they will. The attacks are being coordinated amongst all the four main Resistance groups, as in Iran, Hezbollah, Iraq and Yemen. The Iranians hold the US partly responsible as well, and it is unlikely the Iranians will consult with Americans before firing on Israel this time. American bases in the region could come under fire, too. The assassination of Haniyeh has only hardened the Resistance. His funeral was in Tehran. Haniyeh was Sunni, but his funeral was presided over by Ayatollah Khamenei, a Shia, putting paid to the notion there is a Sunni-Shia split in the region. Iranians poured out into the streets of Tehran to honor Haniyeh at his funeral – and they are vowing revenge for his death. Across the Arab world tributes poured in for Haniyeh. Recent commentary supports the idea that Israel is seeking to provoke a wider war in order to draw in the United States. And regardless of how we see the matter, the wider world, especially the Arab world, sees the Israeli provocations – which is the way they were intended – as the West wanting war with Hezbollah and Iran:
“Israel is single-mindedly in pursuit of a wider war in the region centered on the destruction of the Islamic Republic. It has no intention of moderating this obsession. Haniyeh’s assassination, along with intensifying provocations of Iran, along Israel’s border with Lebanon, and in the West Bank, indicate that it sees the present moment as its opportunity to make this war a reality. Israel knows very well it cannot win the war it craves. As assiduously as it seeks this war is precisely the extent to which it will seek to draw the U.S. into it. This is what makes the insanely intemperate reception Netanyahu received in Congress on July 24 so dangerous.
Within the next days, really, we will see a sharp escalation of the war in West Asia, which may lead to a wider regional war. The retaliatory strikes against Israel will likely be called ‘unprovoked’ in the West, but that makes no difference to the Resistance. Israel has indeed provoked the coming response. And the wider world sees the assassinations as major provocations by the Israelis, and likely an attempt to draw the US into the conflict. The points outlined below follow upon Netanyahu’s visit to Congress and Trump. The following factors are in evidence:
A moderating force: This last item is quite important, because it is a moderating force in what is to come, strange as that might sound. For certain, once Israel is attacked, as seems assured, you will never have heard such a cry of victimhood from the Zionists, with calls to obliterate Iran, both from within Israel and with the hawks in the US Congress, the likes of Lindsay Graham, Tom Cotton and Josh Hawley. Fortunately for us, they are a small minority in Congress. But with the Russian presence in Iran now, the Pentagon will be much more hesitant to launch attacks on Iran directly. Shoigu’s visit is also important, given the rapprochement between Iran and the Saudis brokered by China, in that the Saudis would not be so keen to aid Israel in the event on a wider war. The Saudis are also making amends with Ansarallah in Yemen, since Ansarallah has been reminding the Saudis of what could happen should the Saudis engage in any mischief against Yemen. The Saudi back-down is a strategic loss to the US and Israel. And there is an election in the US in November, in case you didn’t know. Washington wants to avoid a wider war.
Given the points above, what other conclusion would we draw other than a wider war or at least a major escalation in the current tensions is immanent? Yet every military analyst I have heard has stated the IOF has no hope of defeating even Hezbollah, much less the entire Axis of Resistance. Two of the more experienced commentators on the matter differ a bit on what will happen. Elijah Magnier is convinced a wider was will be avoided and outlined why in a recent interview. Alastair Crooke goes the eschatological route and thinks such a war is unavoidable, but even he appears to be changing his tune. Both men have long experience with matters in West Asia and give excellent commentary, which in general agrees. On this one question, they differ a little. It is clear from the bullet points above there is quite a bit of posturing going on, seeking to avoid a wider war. The Israelis have been warned in no uncertain terms that if they attack Lebanon it will be their undoing. The Israelis only seem to understand force, though, and it is force they will get soon enough. Then there is the American view on the matter, which is divided between the public and the lawmakers.
War with Iran?: The hawks in Washington agree with Netanyahu that ultimately Iran must be defeated and pushed back, thinking that would end the Axis of Resistance and secure Western hegemony in the region into the future. Israel is the key to the West’s hegemony in West Asia. But the more hawkish elements in Washington are actually few and appear to be wholly ignorant of what a war with Iran would actually mean. I did a post on that very matter five years ago, still valid though a bit dated (Topic: “What a war with Iran would mean”), so we will not go over old ground here. But since Netanyahu’s spectacle at the US Congress, rhetoric about Iran has been front and center in Western media, with every member of the Axis of Resistance being branded ‘Iran-backed’, even though the only such group joined at the hip with Iran is Hezbollah. The various members of the Resistance are in general independent, yet they coordinate with each other. But here is a main point, and a reason why all the parties involved in fact want to avoid an expanded war: A wider war would mean the expulsion of America from the region, but also tremendous destruction of infrastructure and loss of life on all sides. It would also spell the end of the Zionist project, as well as causing a worldwide economic catastrophe and a mass refugee crisis for Europe. We do not have the space to go into all the ‘whys’ and ‘wherefores’ here. No one with any reasonable and common sense desires such a scenario. But we are dealing with a few deluded and insane people in leadership in Israel and the US. We will probably see a sharp escalation, but as well a sudden realization on the part of the IOF that if there is any chance of Israel surviving it lies in diplomacy rather than military victory. What we will likely see, then, was outlined in a previous link, above:
“These realities suggest a scenario where Washington might force Tel Aviv to absorb the Axis of Resistance’s retaliation, however severe it may be.”
Israel divided: Then there are the most recent events. Also on the 29th, riots broke out in Israel after the IOF arrested nine soldiers on charges of raping Palestinian prisoners at a notorious detention center. The protests were by far-right groups egged on by Ben Gvir, aiming to free the detained soldiers. They are essentially protesting for their right to sexually abuse and torture prisoners, practices in which the Israelis have been engaged as a matter of course for many years. But the fact the soldiers were arrested signaled panic within the IOF, meaning Israel is in a death spiral so long as these practices and the genocide continue. The question is, who will Israel take down with it? Those soldiers have since been released. We won’t go into details, but some people are questioning whether or not Israel is on the brink of civil war. Civil war might be overstating matters or even wishful thinking, but the incidents highlight how broken the society is. The Israeli public is in despair, not seeing any hope for the future of the state. This is exactly the state of mind Hamas leader Sinwar sought to instill in the Israeli public.
Sinwar was just unanimously appointed as the political leader of Hamas, sending the strongest possible signal to the Israelis that Hamas will not stop until Palestine is free. If you want to know more about Sinwar Iran’s PressTV has posted several articles and videos about him. His writings and speeches reveal his mindset regarding Israel and Palestine. Israel will never again be feared in the region and will from now on be insecure. It is doubtful, given military analyses, that the US will be able to save Israel. In that respect Hamas has won the war, as time would eventually reveal, and at the cost of huge suffering. The assassination of Resistance leaders also suggests attempts at ‘decapitation strikes’ ahead of a major military incursion into Lebanon by the IOF. If the Gaza conflict is not resolved soon Israel may well fall apart. So, we prepare ourselves no for what appears to be inevitable. Meanwhile Ukraine and Ukrainians slide into the memory hole of the West. With the recent provocations by Israel against Hezbollah and Iran, the Resistance has said ‘enough is enough’. That phrase brings us to our next topic.
“Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s plans to deploy facial recognition technology more widely in a bid to tackle disorder are “alarming”, a privacy campaign group says. The measure is part of a new “national capability” across police forces to combat the unrest seen in parts of England in the wake of the Southport stabbings, Starmer announced earlier. Big Brother Watch says the plan “threatens rather than protects democracy”. “This AI surveillance turns members of the public into walking ID cards, is dangerously inaccurate and has no explicit legal basis in the UK,” the group’s director, Silkie Carlo, says.”
What is at work here in a wider view is a situation like ‘never let a good crisis go to waste’. Various groups are pushing their own agendas, from what we see: stoking Islamophobia just prior to the Resistance strikes against Israel; distraction from the failed policies of every British government from Thatcher onwards; a reaction against economic hardships, where some in the public blame migrants (legal and otherwise) for loss of jobs and income; just rank racism; stoking violence so the government can introduce more draconian security measures across the nation; even political gaming to put the present government in a bad light – even poorer than its current ratings. And the list is not all-inclusive. But the timing of the riots comes just after Netanyahu’s provocations against Hezbollah and Iran in an effort to bring on a wider regional war. There is more than one agenda at play here, looking beneath the surface, and none of those agendas bode well for the people of the UK. There is also a Zionist element, which should hardly be surprising, given the timing of the riots, and that Zionist element is fomented by the EDL (English Defense League), headed by Tommy Robinson, who has stated he would fight for Israel in a war. Perhaps now he should not waste any time and make his way to Israel. This brings us to the next conflict.
Ukraine update: There is not really much to add here that was not already covered in the update in the last letter. A recent analysis shows the Ukrainians are in deep trouble. The Western press is turning very sour on the conflict there, with reports of dire conditions for the Ukrainians beginning to come out now instead of ‘Ukraine is winning!’ The entire front is collapsing ahead of the Russian advances. Mention was made of the electric war on the past two letters. That situation is so tenuous now that three missile strikes from Russia could black out the entire Ukraine for the near future, causing societal and military collapse. This is Russia’s ‘nuclear option’ for Ukraine, without the nukes. If the war needed to be ended suddenly, that is how the Russians would do so, and without great loss of life in the process. The cities would empty out. All production would stop. The regime in Kiev would have no option but to surrender. How would they fight Russia in such a scenario – with sticks and shovels? There is the sense the whole terrible war could be plausibly wrapped up before the US election in November, were the Russians to pursue that course. Maybe that is what the Russians have in mind.
US politics as spectacle: Politics in America – elections especially – are more about spectacle than anything of real substance. There have been two main events since the last full moon that have turned US politics on its ear. The first was Trump’s ear, followed quickly by the White House palace coup, which is what Biden’s ‘resignation’ actually was. And now we hear Kamala Harris has essentially won the Democrat nomination and has ‘chosen’ her running mate – Tim Walz – of German-Swedish and Catholic descent, although he is a declared Lutheran himself. I have it on good authority from an inside source that ‘he’s the kind of guy you would want to take a casserole to’. He and Harris tick all the right boxes for the liberals. We’ll have more on the personalities in the Leo letter in a couple of weeks, since Leo is all about personality. Just remember: Like we see in the UK, the presidential candidates are not chosen by us. They are chosen in secret meetings of people responsible for executive decisions in world affairs, harking back to the lunar symbol for this full moon. They are vetted by the donor class, put before us as being representative of us and then we get to choose which one we want – or not. Voting is not compulsory in the US. Read Sy Hersh’s description of how Biden was deposed if you want to see how things work in presidential politics. Having been in Rome now and seeing the Colosseum, the term ‘bread and circuses’ has never had more relevance that what we see now in US media and politics. And a Trump victory is not assured. If he keeps going on his same course there is all likelihood he will lose the election, if he even makes it that far. Don’t be at all surprised if there is an October surprise. More in the next letter.
Lavrov just gave a speech at the UN, in which he pointedly singled out Washington for its mischief in the world. He ended his speech with the following words:
“The End of History did not take place. Let’s work together in the interest of the beginning of history of true multilateralism that reflects all the richness of culture and cultural and civilizational multi-diversity of the peoples of the world. I invite everyone to a frank discussion. Of course it has to be an honest one. Thank you very much.”
Well, we all know Rome was not built in a day, nor did it see its demise in one, either. In fact, it still exists and thrives, along with all the reminders of its history in between. And through it all Rome has been a great magnetic world center. In the process of our growth through the millennia, we become magnetic centers ourselves – centers of light, centers of love, expressing wills of our own And we do this together. In concert we thrive. Let our discussions be frank and honest in these days, with the issues standing clear. In a few years of time, what we feel such concern about now will be as but a distant memory. Always seek the wider vista.
These letters are sent as a service. If you wish to be added to or deleted from the mailing list let me know. Feel free to pass these along, but do so without charge or alteration.
https://development.malvinartley.com/2022/02/08/excerpts-from-the-destiny-of-the-nations/ ↑
Related